The kid makes vintage look good
By CyberLizard on Oct 7, 2009 in FAIL, bullshit, cool shit, cuteness, education, equal rights, idiots, schools, style over substance
@Swoopy tweeted this article from the AJC about the ass-backwardness of people in Cobb county Georgia that set me off:
Jonathan Escobar says he chooses to wear clothes that express himself. Skinny jeans, wigs, “vintage” clothing and makeup are the staples of his wardrobe. “I don’t consider myself a cross-dresser,” he said. “This is just who I am.”
But the 16-year-old says an assistant principal at North Cobb High School told him last week he needed to dress more “manly” for school, or consider being home-schooled. He had only been a student at the school for three days.
“I told myself I can’t accept this,” said Escobar, who wore a pink wig to school last Wednesday.
C’mon, the kid can work an outfit, what’s the big deal? Whassamatter, Mr. Assistant Principal, afraid you might get a little excited looking at him? Scared that if you get a chubby while seeing a dude in a wig you’ll turn gay?
For crying out loud, people, can we get over all this panty twisting about gender issues? He dressed tastefully, he looked good and he was a nice kid. Cut him some slack. He’s got bigger balls than you do for wearing that to school. I know; I only managed it for like one day.
Escobar said the assistant principal told him his style of dress had caused a fight between students at the school. Two days later, he withdrew himself from the Kennesaw school.
I’d fight over him; he’s damn cute! Besides, I saw him first, bitch!
“You can’t wear clothing that causes a disruption,” said Jay Dillon Dildo[there, fixed that for ya'] spokesman for Cobb County schools.
Dillon Dildo said he believed Escobar arrived at school in a dress and heels. But Escobar said he never wore a dress. He says he opted for “skinny” jeans all three days with flats.
What, did the Jets and the Sharks start a rumble over his cute flats? I don’t get it. After a few days, the novelty would have worn off, any possible “disruptions” would blow over, and they could all just get along.
You know what the worst part is? He just wants to be loved!
Escobar said he moved to Cobb County from Miami to live with his older sister. His Florida school didn’t have an issue with the way he dressed, but his parents did. His sister, Veronica Escobar, urged her parents to let Jonathan come to live with her. Now she says she’s shocked by what has happened.
See? Poor kid, estranged from his parents for being true to himself. *sniff* Props to that Florida school for not being fucking stupid. Florida > Georgia FTW!
Jonathan Escobar says he wasn’t a disruption in the classroom, but he attracted attention in the lunchroom. “Everybody was surrounding me,” he said.
On his second day of school, Escobar says he was pulled out of class to speak with a police officer who told him he was concerned about the student’s safety.
“They should’ve told the students to back off,” Escobar said. “They should have never given me the option of homeschooling or changing who I am.”
Now I’m starting to get really pissed off. They’re concerned for his safety? Bullshit. This is awfully close to saying that the girl in the miniskirt deserves to get raped. You don’t create a place of safety by forcing people into the closet so that the bigoted fucktards don’t have to look at you. You create safety by creating tolerance, by educating. This isn’t a real hard concept to understand, folks. *sigh*
Apparently there’s a Facebook group for this kid, though I haven’t seen it yet. If you find it, let me know. I’m totally going to join. Maybe I can score a date with him


You rock. That is all.
Swoopy | Oct 7, 2009 | Reply
Thanks! I just can't figure out why people are so threatened by non-traditional gender roles. The hard part about this post was getting over my jealousy at how good he looks. I've lost my \”baby face\”, so I can't pull that look off as well
CyberLizard | Oct 7, 2009 | Reply
Here's my take on the whole justification for suppressing a student like Jonathan. The school officials ALWAYS fall back on that tired old line about how cross-dressing or wearing t-shirts with slogans will "distract students and disrupt the learning process." Yada, yada, yada.
Well, I can think of dozens of things that distract students and disrupt the learning process. Teaching to the test. Moments of "silence," which from what I've seen, teachers and students disregard in equal measure. The Pledge of Allegiance, which is controversial enough nowadays. P.A. systems with sound quality akin to the McDonald's drive-thru. Administrators barging into the classroom to pile more bureaucratic paperwork on the teacher. Assemblies. Pep rallies. Zero tolerance policies that make it all too easy for students to be suspended and/or expelled and/or taken out of the school in handcuffs. Nothing distracting about that — nooooo!
IMO, students need to LEARN HOW to work amid distraction. Adults do it constantly. We take care of our kids with the TV on; we watch traffic while we talk to our kids; we pay bills while the dog is having an existential crisis. It's called LIFE. No two people, and no two days are ever exactly the same. We roll with it. Why can't schools make it a policy that students are expected to do their JOB, which is learning, regardless of visual, auditory, or olfactory distractions in the classroom?
Remove this excuse and school might become less of a gulag.
I guess we can dream.
Volly | Nov 26, 2009 | Reply