Archive for September, 2008
I’m Sick
Posted by CyberLizard in Me, Science, WTF on September 19, 2008
We all knew that, why is that news? This is not my usual mentally-sick sickness I’m talking about. You know, the sickness that manifests in inappropriate jokes, black humor, snarky comments, biting sarcasm, et al. No, my sickness this time is caused by a little thing known as a virus. I’ve got a cold flu black death. I’m dying. All right, technically we’re all actively engaged in the process of dying. And the intellectual part of my brain is telling me that I’m not going to die anytime soon, much less because of this little bug. But that’s not what my body says.
Except, viruses don’t exist. The germ theory is an illusion. I have seen the light, and it comes in the form of the blinding stupidity of one Robert O. Young who tells us:
One must challenge everything in the modern construct of
immunology and what is said to be the immune system. The basis of modern immunology is founded on Louis Pasteur, the fraud, impostor, deceiver and self promoter. There is a serious problem to where every word and part of the anatomy must be questioned to find their use and function because of the fraud of Louis Pasteur.
I mean, how can one deny the brilliance of his logic when describing influenza:
For example, the word influenza means influence. Originally, influenza was said to come from the stars or heavens. The Avian Influenza is an influenza of a bird influence. More specifically, it is an influence of bird waste. The bird consumption industry in Southeast Asia is overcrowded to the point that the chickens are consuming their own waste, producing an over-acidification of the birds and workers that must work in the acidic air and waste.It could be more accurately called Acidic Bird or Chicken Excrement Influenza that is only contagious to those consuming acidic birds, like chicken or breathing chemically altered air from chicken excrement. Because chickens do not have a urinary tract system, like humans and animals they are more likely to absorb their own acidic urine into their tissues. I guess you could say that’s what makes chicken flesh or turkey flesh taste so juicy and why chicken or turkey flesh should never be consumed by humans!
Ahhh, the stupid, it burns more than the fever coursing through my body caused by the non-existant virus:
The word virus is originally Latin meaning poison, as in snake venom, (being too acidic). When a serious snake bite releases venom or acid into the skin and soft tissues, the small sweat vessels become so enlarged that red corpuscles can flow into the tiny seat glands, showing red skin patterns and allowing the venom or acids to escape through the skin. Acidity dissolves and enlarges blood vessels for the movement of acidic fluids or gases. Alkalinity constricts and normalizes the blood vessels.The point being that viruses are molecular liquids or gases (venom) that can be created by chemical imbalances in humans, plants and animals (by malnutrition or toxic acidic food and/or drink consumption), also created in humans, plants and animal glands, sometimes used in defense (snake venom) or emergency (overactive adrenals), also can be crystallized in laboratories, rarely, if ever crystallized in vivo, and foolish to call viruses contagious when viruses are nothing more than acidic liquids or gases from biological transformation or rotting matter.
The brilliant “scientist” leaves us with these thoughts to ponder:
As you contemplate the cause of the flu, cold or any so-called infection, may I suggest that each of us take personal responsibility for the consequences of our choices, rather than blame a phantom Avian Influenza virus, cold virus, flu virus, cancer virus or some non-existent HIV virus. If you get sick, it is your own fault and not the cause of some phantom virus that you can blame to cover your own lifestyle and dietary transgressions. Save your money and save your life by making alkalizing and energizing lifestyle and dietary choices. This is where true immunity is found — not in a vaccine or a drug which are all acidic and poisonous to the body but in living an alkaline lifestyle.
Sigh. So much for my attempts to lay the blame at the feet of microscopic little buggers for my illness. Instead it’s because I had that glass of lemonade.
Many thanks to Orac for introducing me to the truth about germs.
I won’t be buying a GM car anytime soon
Posted by CyberLizard in Politics, Science on September 17, 2008
Bob Lutz was the guest on the Colbert Report tonight (last night, it’s after midnight. whatever). He’s there to talk about the Volt, GM’s new electric car. Ok, cool. Except Mr. Lutz isn’t so cool. It would appear that he is a climate change denialist. Came right out and said he thought the planet might be warming, but didn’t believe the “CO
Well, he apparently felt the need to out do him self. When Colbert got into the “man talk” and asked him if the Volt was sexy, if it would get him laid, Lutz responded that it might, but that it would attract a different type of woman. What type is that, you may ask? “…a lot of no makeup, environmentally aware [mumble]” women. Say what? Maybe I’m overreacting, but that sounds like a slam to me. Given Lutz’s disregard for the environment it wouldn’t surprise me that his attitudes towards women get the same regard.
Die, Mouse, Die!
Posted by CyberLizard in Local & State, Religion on September 17, 2008
Hat tip to PZ.
Apparently mice are bad. I mean, really bad. Not just, “they’re bad but we can ignore them” kind of bad, but “EXTERMINATE!” bad. So bad that even cartoon representations of them must die.
According to Sheikh Muhammad Munajid,
The mouse is one of Satan’s soldiers and is steered by him.
and
According to Islamic law, the mouse is a repulsive, corrupting creature.
Even better:
Mickey Mouse has become an awesome character, even though according to Islamic law, Mickey Mouse should be killed in all cases.
Nooooo!!!! Not the Mouse!
Seriously, I live in Florida. You kill Mickey Mouse and what have we got left? Lightning, sharks, hurricanes and religious whackaloons. Don’t do that to me!
I Can Haz Munny?
Posted by CyberLizard in Politics on September 17, 2008
IANAE (I Am Not An Economist). I vaguely recall taking economics in college. I think. But things are lookin’ pretty bad out there. I hear even fervent supporters of the “free market” clamoring for more/new regulation of our financial markets. But one thing they will never acknowledge is the fact that their pushes for deregulation are what led us here.
Now, I’m all for making money. I have a good job, I pay taxes, pay (most) of my bills. I understand the need to exchange currency for goods. I’m not anti-money, or anti-capitalism. But it seems to me that there is a fundamental problem that the free-marketeers are overlooking: humans are selfish, maybe even greedy. We’ve evolved that way. Survival of the fittest. May the best man win. It’s what kept us alive when survival was a tooth-and-nails experience. However we, as thinking, rational people, manage to balance this innate desire with some common sense and compassion.
Also, most of us are living in a world where we will never have access to the kind of money (and power, I think that falls under this same concept) that Wall Street tycoons, big corporate CEO’s, certain religious leaders and high-level government muckety-mucks deal with on a daily basis. Because of this, our desires tend to take a back seat to necessities, like paying the mortgage/rent, car payments, buying food and fuel. We live in a much smaller world where the impacts of our actions have a much more noticeable affect on our immediate family and friends. If you cheat your friends or your community out of money, or commit crimes against them, there is a much more direct and immediate response against you. So our desires for more money and possessions, at this level, generally lead to us working harder, getting education, trying to move up the corporate ladder and so forth. The results of this are generally beneficial to us and those around us. There are exceptions, of course, and those of us in more dire circumstances find a lot more pressure to engage in activities that circumvent the improvement process; crime, get-rich-quick schemes, lottery tickets, etc. But on the whole we manage to make do and hopefully improve our lives. All well and good.
But I think that when you reach a certain level of wealth/power, those negative impacts become further and further removed from you. Rather than engaging in commerce with a specific individual, you’re dealing with an abstract “corporation”. You’re dealing with “constituents” rather than neighbors. You begin dealing in numbers so staggering that the relative impact of losing a few grand gets smaller and smaller, so you lose sight and comprehension of that impact to someone not in your position.
I must admit to falling into this trap myself. I can remember a time, not all that long ago, 10 years or so, when my wife and I would literally scrounge pennies and loose change from the sofa to be able to go to Taco Bell (remember $0.39 tacos?). Time passes, careers progress, and I have found myself sweeping up those same pennies and dropping them in the dustbin without thinking. Humans have a remarkable ability to forget pain, which can be a good thing; otherwise women would never have more than one baby
But it also allows us to forget how to relate to others in more difficult circumstances than we are. And if you’ve never experienced more difficult circumstances yourself, it becomes that more more difficult to relate. I’ve never been homeless, never been truly hungry. I’ve never had my family massacred or been forced to flee my home.
But that’s where another human trait comes in handy. We have the ability to empathize with others. We are capable of consuming information, processing it, and using it to extrapolate what it must be like to be in an other person’s situation. This means that is possible to understand the impacts of our decisions on others who aren’t at the same place in the world that we are. And the further you are removed from that situation, the more difficult that process becomes. Which is why we need to work harder at it.
So, my point, after all this rambling, is that we need to provide safeguards against the known proclivities of people and part of that, I believe, is reasonable regulation of the financial markets. That way, even if those people who are so far removed from our reality that they fail to or cannot fathom why them making money at the risk or expense of others is wrong, they might still avoid doing it for a greedy and selfish reason: to avoid going to prison.
Some confirmation of what I’ve suspected
Posted by CyberLizard in Politics, Science, WTF on September 16, 2008
I have been struggling to find some logical reason for the Republicans refusal to acknowledge reality. The hypocrisy displayed by the republican party this election cycle is just astounding. Even when they are flat-out proven wrong, the right-wing pundits keep spouting the same garbage.
Fortunately, I’m not the only one to notice. Jonah Lehrer of the blog “Frontal Cortex” has a good summary of this phenomenon:
I think this experiment helps explains a rather disturbing amount of our political discourse. What it neatly demonstrates is that the main reason so many campaigns traffic in dishonest allegations and pseudofacts is that, when it comes to voters, the facts don’t really matter. Most of us are just partisan hacks:
Political scientists Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler provided two groups of volunteers with the Bush administration’s prewar claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. One group was given a refutation — the comprehensive 2004 Duelfer report that concluded that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction before the United States invaded in 2003. Thirty-four percent of conservatives told only about the Bush administration’s claims thought Iraq had hidden or destroyed its weapons before the U.S. invasion, but 64 percent of conservatives who heard both claim and refutation thought that Iraq really did have the weapons. The refutation, in other words, made the misinformation worse.
A similar “backfire effect” also influenced conservatives told about Bush administration assertions that tax cuts increase federal revenue. One group was offered a refutation by prominent economists that included current and former Bush administration officials. About 35 percent of conservatives told about the Bush claim believed it; 67 percent of those provided with both assertion and refutation believed that tax cuts increase revenue.
In a paper approaching publication, Nyhan, a PhD student at Duke University, and Reifler, at Georgia State University, suggest that Republicans might be especially prone to the backfire effect because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals: Upon hearing a refutation, conservatives might “argue back” against the refutation in their minds, thereby strengthening their belief in the misinformation. Nyhan and Reifler did not see the same “backfire effect” when liberals were given misinformation and a refutation about the Bush administration’s stance on stem cell research.
I had to read this a few times to wrap my head around it. Basically, it shows that more people believed the lies after seeing proof of its fallacy than before. WTF?
He continues:
The Princeton political scientist Larry Bartels analyzed survey data from the 1990′s to prove the same point. During the first term of Bill Clinton’s presidency, the budget deficit declined by more than 90 percent. However, when Republican voters were asked in 1996 what happened to the deficit under Clinton, more than 55 percent said that it had increased.
Again with the denial of reality. Is this really so hard to comprehend:
Or how about this one? To difficult to process?
Yeah, right, “Drill, baby, drill”. Graph from ::Architecture 2030
Anyway, back to the analysis:
What’s interesting about this data is that so-called “high-information” voters – these are the Republicans who read the newspaper, watch cable news and can identify their representatives in Congress – weren’t better informed than “low-information” voters. (The sole exception was Republicans who are ranked in the top 10 percent in terms of political information. As Bartels notes, it’s only among these people that “the pull of objective reality begins to become apparent.”) These citizens According to Bartels, the reason knowing more about politics doesn’t erase partisan bias is that voters tend to only assimilate those facts that confirm what they already believe. If a piece of information doesn’t follow Republican talking points – and Clinton’s deficit reduction didn’t fit the “tax and spend liberal” stereotype – then the information is conveniently ignored. “Voters think that they’re thinking,” Bartels says, “but what they’re really doing is inventing facts or ignoring facts so that they can rationalize decisions they’ve already made.” Once we identify with a political party, the world is edited so that it fits with our ideology.
Sigh. Still, I feel the need to keep preaching, even if it is only to the choir.
I’m coming out…
Posted by CyberLizard in Atheism, Politics, Religion on September 12, 2008
… so you better get this party started.
I really liked the first one. Turns out I’m really bad at my lyrics. The Pink song is “I’m coming up” not “I’m coming out”. Diana Ross did the “I’m coming out” one.
Anyway, the point is that I’m coming out. And it’s not what you think. Not that I have anything against that kind of coming out. Really.
Anyway, what am I babbling about? There’s a new icon in my sidebar. A big scarlet ‘A’ (Most people would call it red, I like the implication of “scarlet A”). I’m talking about The OUT Campaign. You can read Richard Dawkins’ Introduction to it. It’s doing my little part to help the world realize that godlessness does not equal lack of morals or satanism or eating little babies (or communism or anti-americanism or any of a number of other things the Xians would like you to believe about us). One really big point to make is that we are NOT trying to eradicate Christians, or any religion for that matter. Our biggest gripe is that religion is trying to be forced into places it doesn’t belong.
The presidential election cycle here in the United States has forced me out of the closet. The ramrodding of so-called “Christian values” into our government must stop. It is literally sickening to me to see our country betrayed this way by a bunch of hypocritical bullshitters. I believe that our founding fathers would be rather disgusted by what’s going on today. Archiving Early America has a great article that clearly shows that the intent of our government is secular. My favorite is this quote from the Treaty of Tripoli back in the late 1700′s:
As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries. [emphasis mine]
I mean, you can’t get much clearer than that. This was written in the last term of George Washington’s presidency and signed into law by John Adams during his presidency. Pretty unambiguous statement from our founding fathers themselves, eh? One of the basic principles of our country is freedom of religion. This also includes freedom from religion.
So I’m coming out. Reason must win. The motto of the Scottish clan that I am technically a member of (Keith) is “Veritas vincit” (Truth conquers). I’m going to hold to that and work to make it so.
Links to a few other good Atheist blogs that I follow:
Pharyngula
Rev. BigDumbChimp
Possummomma (aka, Atheist in a minivan)
Atheist Revolution
Enemy Combatant Trailmix Appreciation Club
Some people should NOT be performing
Posted by CyberLizard in Religion on September 12, 2008
Thank you, Rev. BigDumbChimp, for giving me a good laugh.
He taught me how to praise my god and still play rock-and-roll
Apparently this guy’s mistaken about a number of things, not the least of which is the definition of “rock-and-roll”.
And did they rip off those dresses from my high school choir? [/inside joke]
Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl
The Oh of Pleasure
Posted by CyberLizard in Science, Sex on September 12, 2008
The headline caught my eye, I must say:
Stroking reveals pleasure nerve
Thank you, Jenny Carpenter, Science Reporter for the BBC, for this hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism.
A new touch-sensitive nerve fibre responsible for the sense of pleasure experienced during stroking has been described at a UK conference today.
Oh, it gets better:
The nerves tap into a human’s reward pathways, and could help explain why we enjoy grooming and a good hug, a neuroscientist has explained.
His team used a stroking machine to reveal the optimal speed and pressure for the most enjoyable caress. (emphasis mine)
I know a few people who would like to get their hands on that machine.
In order to isolate the touch-sensitive nerves responsible for the pleasure experienced during stroking, Professor McGlone designed a “rotary tactile stimulator” – a high-tech stroking machine.
“We have built some very sophisticated equipment, so the stimulus [of stroking] is very repeatable.”
Now this is the kind of science I can get into! Unfortunately, the article goes on to destroy my hopes and dreams:
Professor McGlone points out that these touch nerves are not responsible for the pleasure experienced from rubbing sexual organs, nor are they found in a person’s palms or soles.
Well, then, what’s the point?
Still very powerful after seven years
Posted by CyberLizard in Uncategorized on September 11, 2008
Thank you, Orac, for posting this. It moved me enough to repost here. There’s something about watching this for so many minutes from the same location, you begin to feel a sense of familiarity with the area. It makes it that much harder when the end comes. My heart goes out to all those who have been affected by such a horrific event.
A commenter on the above blog struck a chord with me:
…I fear that this sort of video can too easily become the centerpiece for a two minute hate. I didn’t admire the 9/11 attackers. I don’t like their goals or their methods. I don’t want to live in a country that is using the same essential method–destroy people and thing until your opponent gives up–to get its way. I don’t know how to stop terrorism. But I do know that I don’t want people in Iraq and Afghanistan and maybe soon Iran to be facing this kind of destruction and worse on a daily basis because people see videos like this…
I’ll leave with this thought:
A Blessing for All Beings
May everyone be happy and safe,
and may their hearts be filled with joy.
May all living beings live in security and in peace
beings who are frail or strong,
tall or short, big or small,
visible or not visible, near or far away,
already born or yet to be born.
May all of them dwell in perfect tranquility.
Let no one do harm to anyone.
Let no one put the life of anyone in danger.
Let no one, out of anger or ill will,
wish anyone any harm.
Metta Sutta (Stuttanipata)
Translated by Thich Nhat Hahn.
Post to del.icio.us | Digg this | Post to Furl
Science in da’ house!
Posted by CyberLizard in Science on September 10, 2008
Since I’ve already introduced you to this science music, I figure I should broaden your horizons even more. It’s especially appropriate today because they just fired up the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) this morning. Enjoy.
Hat tip to GrrlScientist for reminding me about the big event today and its musical significance.

